Mongabay: Deforestation puts lives on the line in rural Myanmar

On a still, heavy afternoon in September, with monsoon clouds massing lazily in the sky, the threat of the elephants seems far away. But U Sein Than, a 50-year-old rice farmer living in remote Taik Kyi village in Myanmar, says there is one nearby.

He will not take us near in case it charges.

“When the elephants come, I light a fire and order the children into the tree houses,” says Than. “If you go near them, they chase you. We know when they are coming because we can hear them.”

Instead, we walk in the footsteps of the elephants across leech-infested paddy fields. He points out a tree where he says an elephant gouged a hole in the wood with its tusk.

A whole reported to have been caused by an elephant's tusk
A whole reported to have been caused by an elephant’s tusk

Ten minutes later, we reach another tree house. It is deserted, tattered sheets hanging loose from the beams.

“This was my brother-in-law’s, but he abandoned it. He got too scared,” Than says, indicating at least a dozen elephant footprints clustered around the base of the tree, and a smooth patch of bark high up, where he says the elephant scratched itself.

In this village in the Burmese jungle just 45 miles from Yangon, elephant and man are at loggerheads.

Mysterious origins

The villagers aren’t sure why the elephants started coming to their village – perhaps logging destroyed their habitat, perhaps flooding from a dam – but they do know the consequences: 40 human deaths in the last eight years, according to village leader, U Sai Than Hlaing, 45.

“The elephants lost their habitats, so they come down to the village,” Hlaing says. “At first they only came for sugar cane, but then the elephants learned to eat human food.”

U Sein Than perches in a treehouse he built as refugee from the elephants.
U Sein Than perches in a treehouse he built as refugee from the elephants.

U Sein Than knows all about that. He describes his farming business as a “lottery” because of the elephants. “If three come, they destroy two acres of rice paddy. If I cultivate 100 percent of the rice, I only get 30 percent of it because of the elephants.”

The farmers can’t protect their crops, but they can protect their families.

Hence, the tree houses.

But Than’s brother-in-law isn’t the only one to have given up and relocated. Two other villages nearby have been abandoned because of the elephants.

“But I am not going,” says Than. “I have no other option. We have lived here for generations. If I left, it would only be to go and live in the jungle.” He doesn’t blame the animals, though.

“I just don’t want the elephants to come here anymore,” he says. “I want the government to help the elephants. I want them to find them somewhere to live.”

A treehouse built to escape the elephants.
A treehouse built to escape the elephants.

This loss of a place to live – not just for elephants, but for many other animals and plant species – is a huge issue in Myanmar. A 2015 forestry assessment done by the UN’s Food and Agriculture Organization found that the country had the third highest rate of annual forest reduction in the world.

In the years between 1990 and 2015, Myanmar lost almost a staggering 15 million hectares of forests and other wooded lands.

Logging ban

There was a glimmer of hope this summer when Aung San Suu Kyi’s new democratic government set about banning logging for the next fiscal year (although detail is still scant, and illegal logging remains a major problem in Myanmar).

It is currently unclear what will happen when the year-long ban – which builds on the previous administration’s raw timber export ban – ends, but conservation groups have welcomed it.

“If the logging doesn’t stop, everything is going to go,” says Dr. Amirtharaj Christy Williams, Myanmar country director for the World Wildlife Fund (WWF). “It’s important to have a ban and really think about how to do this in the future.”

But there’s a snag. While the ban sounds like it is good news for wild elephants in Myanmar, and maybe even for villagers like U Sein Than too (if, for example, elephants can move back into newly quiet forests), it’s not quite as simple as that.

Simon Hedges, elephant co-ordinator at the Wildlife Conservation Society, explains.

“One of the challenges unique to Myanmar is the very large number of captive elephants relative to the wild population,” he says. “And they are obviously now underemployed – if not unemployed – because of the logging ban. And the big question is what to do with lots of those elephants.”

The logging-elephant bond

If Hedges doesn’t pose the million dollar question, it’s certainly the 5,000 pachyderm question. That is the rough number of captive elephants in Myanmar, according to the WWF. Wild elephant numbers are much lower: estimates range between 1,000 up to 3,000.

Of those 5,000 captive elephants, 2,500 work in the logging industry for state-owned logging company, Myanma Timber Enterprise (MTE).

An abandoned treehouse
An abandoned treehouse

Strong, clever elephants have worked in logging hand in trunk with their mahouts, the men who train, work with and look after them, for more than 100 years. Ideally, the MTE elephants work until they are 55 and are then pensioned off to nearby forest areas with their mahouts for their twilight years.

Things are a bit more complicated now. It’s been widely reported that the previous government’s export ban means there are already high numbers of unemployed elephants.

And there are no real answers yet about what the elephants are doing while the logging industry has temporarily downed tools for the ban.

Read the full article at


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s